To#nbsp;start with a#nbsp;question: try to#nbsp;identify the target building for which the visualization was made on#nbsp;the images. Honestly, without closely inspecting in#nbsp;high resolution, it’s not immediately clear. You can check if#nbsp;your identification is#nbsp;correct by#nbsp;following the link with the project name. At#nbsp;the end, there will be#nbsp;a#nbsp;video with the montage.
I#nbsp;can’t say anything bad about the montage (both the birds and the close-up angles). However, there is#nbsp;a#nbsp;repeat of#nbsp;the matte paint story, where we#nbsp;are tightly bound to#nbsp;viewpoints and their atmosphere.
As#nbsp;a#nbsp;bonus, we#nbsp;get the right not to#nbsp;model the surrounding buildings and the general plan. In#nbsp;return, we#nbsp;need additional time for the precise setup of#nbsp;the angle and atmosphere settings.
Also, our realities are hardly suitable for montage: dilapidated architecture, garbage, and other unsightliness are absent except perhaps in#nbsp;central parts of#nbsp;cities, like near-Garden spaces.